New York Personal Injury Lawyer
www.lawfitz.com

   New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer

Call Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald Today at 800-323-9900, New York Personal Injury LawyersNew York Personal Injury Lawyer
Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C. - New York Personal Injury Lawyer, and New York Lead Paint Poisoning Attorneys New York Lead Paint Poisoning Lawyers
Fill out the following and we will review and contact you.
*Name:
*Phone:   
*E-mail:
*How Did You Hear About Us?:
*If You Used a Search Engine, Which One?:
Comments:



New York Lead Paint Poisoning Lawyers

New York Personal Injury Lawyer
New York Personal Injury LawyerNew York Personal Injury LawyerReturn to New York Personal Injury LawyerContact a New York Personal Injury LawyerNew York Personal Injury Lawyers SitemapNew York Personal Injury LawyerNew York Personal Injury Lawyer
Medical Malpractice
$13,629,000 Jury Verdict


Birth Trauma - Failure to diagnose pre-term labor CP - Spastic Diplegia
Accidents | Autism | Birth Injuries | Cerebral Palsy | Lead Poisoning | Medical Malpractice | Slip And FallNew York Personal Injury Lawyer

   New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers

   New York Personal Injury LawyerNew York Personal Injury Lawyer

New York Personal Injury Lawyer Case Results Disclaimer
F&F# 92220A
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - BIRTH TRAUMA - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE PRE-TERM LABOR - CP - SPASTIC DIPLEGIA
Jury Verdict: $13,629,000 (Unanimous 6/0) BREAKDOWN: $1,700,000 for past pain and suffering; $2,000,000 for future pain and suffering (60.6 years); $2,000,000 for impaired earning capacity (38.9 years); $75,000 for future medical care; $2,000,000 for future therapy; $4,000 for future lab work; $100,000 for future medical supplies and equipment; $1,500,000 for future home equipment; adaptations, and transportation; $250,000 for future aide or attendant (until age 21); $4,000,000 for future group home (after age 21).
Injuries:
  • Brain damage
  • Spastic diplegia
  • Cognitive deficits

Plaintiff, age 12 at the time of trial, could stand with assistance but could not walk. He had limited use of his hands but could type slowly on a keyboard. He was on a home study program.

Facts:

Plaintiff's mother was under the care of defendants Drs. Dolkar and Sharlow of the Newton Ob/Gyn Assoc. (Dolkart and Newton Ob/Gyn 70% liable) for her pregnancy. Her estimated delivery date was 5/4/84. On the morning of 2/8/84, she experienced pinkish discharge and cramping, and called defendants' office. She was told to call back if the symptoms persisted. That evening, she insisted on seeing a doctor, and Dr. Sharlow performed a urinalysis and diagnosed a urinary tract infection. He prescribed Macrodantin and sent plaintiff's mother home. The next morning, she again called defendants because the spotting was darker and her cramps were more severe. She was instructed to go to the hospital and was admitted at 9:50 AM at 28 weeks gestation. She was seen at 10:50 AM by Dr. Dolkart, who ordered a sonogram to rule out placenta previa or abruptio placenta. He left the hospital before the results were available. Dr. Dolkart did not order a fetal heart monitor, but instructed the nurse to observe and notify him of any change in bleeding or cramping.

The hospital chart indicated that labor began at 8 PM, and at 10 PM plaintiff's mother complained that the cramps had worsened. Dr. Dolkart was called at 10:30 PM and instructed the nurse to put the patient on a fetal heart monitor and call him. Plaintiff's mother was placed on the fetal heart monitor at 10:45 PM. Dr. Dolkart was called at 11 PM and told that the contractions were 5 minutes apart. He arrived at the hospital at 11:35 PM and diagnosed that plaintiff's mother was in labor and 4 cm dilated at 11:45. He ordered Ritodrine tocolytic therapy, which was started at 12:01 AM. At 12:05, plaintiff's mother was 5 cm dilated and Dr. Dolkart terminated the Ritodrine therapy, and at 12:56 AM, he performed a Caesarean section. The infant plaintiff was delivered with Apgars of 1 and 6 at 1 and 5 minutes. He suffered from respiratory distress syndrome, apnea, and mild fibroplasias.

The jury found that the nurse departed from accepted medical standards for failing to earlier notify Dr. Dolkart of the change in plaintiff's mother's status, and found that this medical negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries.



New York Lead Paint Poisoning Lawyers New York Lead Paint Poisoning Lawyers
New York Personal Injury Lawyer
New York Personal Injury Lawyer
©2008 Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C.
Legal Disclaimer   Privacy Policy    New York Personal Injury Lawyer

New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Home New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Practice Areas New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Newsroom New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Case Results New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Media Center New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Attorney Profiles New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Contact Us New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers Sitemap

Fitzgerald and Fitzgerald, P.C.: New York Medical Malractice Lawyer

The medical malpractice, personal injury, premises liability, slip and fall, police negligence, police brutality, class actions, appeals lawyer, appellate practice, product liability, brain injury, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, catastrophic injury, automobile accident, wrongful death, building owner negligence, negligence, premises liability, product liability or other legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth here were dependent on the facts of that case and the results will differ from case to case. Please contact a personal injury attorney or wrongful death lawyer at our New York law firm.

©2008 Fitzgerald and Fitzgerald
disclaimer
privacy policy
caldia technologies

New York Personal Injury Lawyer